Quite a disturbing fantasy..*be warned* - Page 2 - Rape Board

pervipete · 03-09-2009, 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by somedude

so how would you like to be a eunech italianguy?
Not such a sexy idea is it...

No, but tempting if run into him

somedude · 03-09-2009, 03:29 PM

Well couldn't castrate italianguy but did ban him! No need for trolls like him.

pervipete · 03-09-2009, 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by somedude

Well couldn't castrate italianguy but did ban him! No need for trolls like him.

That'll do...

ChiTownHoney · 03-09-2009, 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by italianguy

The practice was called "female circumcision" but then people started complaining, "why do you think that female circumcision is wrong and male circumcision is not wrong?", so feminists changed the name to "female genital mutilation". Now people can say "female genital mutilation is wrong, male circumcision is not wrong" without feeling stupid.

You have a point there. Male circumcision is stupid as hell, my ex wasnt circumcised and he was just fine, as a matter of fact there was absolutely no difference between him and the other guys I was with that were circumcised. I actually probably couldnt tell without looking really closely and really feeling it.

As long as female circumcision goes...a long time ago, that sounded like a fetching idea to me, I would have wanted it done. I dont think you need your clit anyways. Probably better not to have it.

MARADONA · 03-10-2009, 06:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sternenlied

Unfortunately yes.
It's called "female genital cutting", "female circumcision" or "female genital mutilation", already expressing different views of the subject. I certainly feel "mutilation" is the most appropriate term since there's no medical value of the procedure, it's just sick.
It is divided into four categories (if I remember correctly) and still a highly debated and opposed subject since it's traditionally done without anaesthestics and proven to have vast medical, psychological and of course sexual consequences for the women (mostly still at a young age).

Yes i heard of it...for my studies...they simply use to cut the "clitolide"...beh kinda crazy to me...
it's a real mutilation...and it's a real "barbaria" that is used in those "old" african countries where women are treated like pieces of meat...
i'm wondering why they don't use to cut their "wee-wee" as well...huh??? Beh is too lame to be real..but unfortunatelly it's real...
what it's sucks is that the girls have not the power to say no...they have to do it yes or yes...otherwise they will be out from the tribu.
Here the law punish this kind of bad & crazy mutilations...and it's totally right...no doubt about it.

MARADONA · 03-10-2009, 06:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by italianguy

Stern, since I read the topic I was sure to find your post here to make some feminist propaganda.

you forgot to say two things:
1) female circumcision makes you wet.
2) female genital mutilation is not the "correct term", it's the term that feminists invented.

The practice was called "female circumcision" but then people started complaining, "why do you think that female circumcision is wrong and male circumcision is not wrong?", so feminists changed the name to "female genital mutilation". Now people can say "female genital mutilation is wrong, male circumcision is not wrong" without feeling stupid.

Now female genital mutilation can be linked to "gender violence" in a funny feminist theory about males that beat females and people can't say anymore "they circumcise boys too and circumcision is not considered gender violence".

The next step to modify the language is to change the meaning of "gender violence" to violence of males against females, not violence whose cause is gender, so it will be implicit in the term that violence of females against males (caused by gender and not other causes) can't even exist and it will be implicit that violence against females is the "norm".

Remember this when Stern will correct you that "gender violence means violence against females".

PS: I read your last post only now, I was wondering why you didn't write the theory that males control female body or other similar bullshit. You waited another post. You couldn't resist eh? You had to write it.

Yes there are a lot of feminists campaign to stop female circumcision. Only. Not to stop genital mutilation of all the people. Thanks for reminding us Stern.

Quote:

Originally Posted by italianguy

Now talking about sexy things instead of ugly feminist theories, this topic is not disturbing at all, why did you write disturbing in the title? The disturbing word offends people who thinks that female circumcision is hot, we live in the politically correct age, I suggest you to change the title to "a sexy fantasy".

Sorry to see you banned...but you are very disturbed...and also you don't a know a shit about it.

As far as i know this "practice" remove the possibilty to have a complete orgasm and i don't have to explain you why.

Goodbye Italianguy!

MARADONA · 03-10-2009, 06:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiTownHoney

You have a point there. Male circumcision is stupid as hell, my ex wasnt circumcised and he was just fine, as a matter of fact there was absolutely no difference between him and the other guys I was with that were circumcised. I actually probably couldnt tell without looking really closely and really feeling it.

As long as female circumcision goes...a long time ago, that sounded like a fetching idea to me, I would have wanted it done. I dont think you need your clit anyways. Probably better not to have it.

Beh Chi i advice you to take some infos about it...the clit is there for a reason...without it your life will not be the same.

kitty_joanne · 03-10-2009, 07:02 AM

I'd actually prefer men to be circumcised, the penis looks better, with the head arching hard towards the front with no flabby skin covering it..

I find it more concentrated and convincing looking to be sucked on, and also it provides a nice handle around my little fingers.

MARADONA · 03-10-2009, 07:36 AM

Looks like i have to circumcise myself!!!

No beh just joking!!!

Hugues_de_Sade · 03-10-2009, 08:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by italianguy

Stern, since I read the topic...

Phew, what a lunatic!

Thx and + rep for the wise decision of banning him.

Quote:

Originally Posted by littlemissRotter

It's quite a disturbing fantasy but i have been fascinated about being sewn down there or even worse have my 'bits below removed. [...]
Anyone out there that has anything as remotly weird as that? Maybe a rapist going that step to far and doing the above so that the rapee will be constantly reminded. Or is this idea overal just sick.

No, I've never thought of anything like it. The idea of mutilation is completely unerotic to me. The pussy is so lovely as it is. Slapping it - yes! Destroying it - no!

MARADONA · 03-10-2009, 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Parisa

ahahhaha! a guy teaching a gal about the functions of a clit. what's the world coming to

I was just saying that remove it is not a good idea...i'm not a woman of course...so well...
my aknoweledge is pretty limitated...but i'm not virgin you know...i learned that is important for a woman.

sindyloo · 03-10-2009, 12:03 PM

Now...if you could just find the G spot?

MARADONA · 03-10-2009, 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sindyloo

Now...if you could just find the G spot?

I'm the G-spot!

Conrad · 03-10-2009, 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sindyloo

Now...if you could just find the G spot?

Tried and, much like in life, failed. Actually I thought I had it, from the things I'd read on how to find it etc, I was in the right place and it felt right, but I rubbed for ages and got little to no reaction. So my question is, does it have to be stimulated for a long time or is the response a more instant affair; I'm not talking about sending my partner to an earth shattering orgasim as soon as I touch it, but thought she might at least let me know I was doing something right.

Lucy. · 03-10-2009, 08:33 PM

I had never ever once ever thought about this. I didn't even think it was possible really.

Not for me.

As for men, I never even met a guy who was circumcised (who told or i saw). I think that its more popular in America. Most British guys i know haven't had it done. Hardly comparable to this mutilation thingy in my opinion though.

Lucy. · 03-10-2009, 08:43 PM

I don't think it is. I never met a guy with it. As far as I knew it was something Jewish men had done. But then I heard it was popular in the USA.

Maybe i've just been with the wrong guys.

Conrad · 03-10-2009, 08:53 PM

Not circumcised, if that's a good or bad thing I don't know

Conrad · 03-10-2009, 08:59 PM

Erm no thanks, getting done later in life is supposed to have complications.... heaven knows how that would be magnified in the hands of a less than skilled surgeon

Conrad · 03-10-2009, 09:04 PM

Terrifying. You can put your mouth on it if you like but you can't do that.

ChiTownHoney · 03-10-2009, 09:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Conrad

Tried and, much like in life, failed. Actually I thought I had it, from the things I'd read on how to find it etc, I was in the right place and it felt right, but I rubbed for ages and got little to no reaction. So my question is, does it have to be stimulated for a long time or is the response a more instant affair; I'm not talking about sending my partner to an earth shattering orgasim as soon as I touch it, but thought she might at least let me know I was doing something right.

Thats because hookers dont actually enjoy sex. They do it for the money.

On a serious note, The g spot is NOT hard to find.

03-09-2009, 03:29 PM	#22
somedude W.I.R. and Marshal Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Way out West!!!! Posts: 8,566 Reputation: 124981	Well couldn't castrate italianguy but did ban him! No need for trolls like him. __________________ I'm a pervert and proud of it!

03-10-2009, 07:36 AM	#29
MARADONA Banned Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Land of the Lost Posts: 1,838 Reputation: 40272	eh eh Looks like i have to circumcise myself!!! No beh just joking!!!

03-10-2009, 12:03 PM	#32
sindyloo Privileged Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 2,178 Reputation: 34844	Now...if you could just find the G spot? __________________ Tommy Loy, the cabin boy, The dirty little nipper, He filled his ass With broken glass And cirumcized the skipper!

03-10-2009, 08:53 PM	#37
Conrad RB's Biggest Loser Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 895 Reputation: 20387	Not circumcised, if that's a good or bad thing I don't know __________________ Taking the word Pathetic to new levels since 1982.

03-10-2009, 08:59 PM	#38
Conrad RB's Biggest Loser Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 895 Reputation: 20387	Erm no thanks, getting done later in life is supposed to have complications.... heaven knows how that would be magnified in the hands of a less than skilled surgeon __________________ Taking the word Pathetic to new levels since 1982.

03-10-2009, 07:02 AM	#28
kitty_joanne Sleeping Siren Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Suburb Posts: 2,817 Reputation: 28630	I'd actually prefer men to be circumcised, the penis looks better, with the head arching hard towards the front with no flabby skin covering it.. I find it more concentrated and convincing looking to be sucked on, and also it provides a nice handle around my little fingers.

03-10-2009, 08:33 PM	#35
Lucy. Banned Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: In a warzone? Posts: 634 Reputation: 21842	I had never ever once ever thought about this. I didn't even think it was possible really. Not for me. As for men, I never even met a guy who was circumcised (who told or i saw). I think that its more popular in America. Most British guys i know haven't had it done. Hardly comparable to this mutilation thingy in my opinion though.

03-10-2009, 08:43 PM	#36
Lucy. Banned Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: In a warzone? Posts: 634 Reputation: 21842	I don't think it is. I never met a guy with it. As far as I knew it was something Jewish men had done. But then I heard it was popular in the USA. Maybe i've just been with the wrong guys.

03-10-2009, 09:04 PM	#39
Conrad RB's Biggest Loser Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 895 Reputation: 20387	Terrifying. You can put your mouth on it if you like but you can't do that. __________________ Taking the word Pathetic to new levels since 1982.