All german nazis? - Page 3 - Rape Board

Rogue · 03-17-2007, 11:02 AM

Now we're talking...

somedude · 03-17-2007, 12:46 PM

The Westgarde Entry!!!

Louise · 03-17-2007, 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by somedude

The Westgarde Entry!!!

Darling...I thought you were going to keep that drawing of me private

somedude · 03-17-2007, 02:00 PM

Well Westgarde needed an entry and it was either that or...

Luke rape stalker · 03-17-2007, 08:31 PM

what i know about hitler is...

he was a perfect speaker (for his intentions) the whole think was very well planed.

First: "iÂ´m here for you" in germany was less jobs, he give jobs for all.

Second: "the others are bad" with wrong informations like "they attack us" he get the folk on his side.

third: "i do what you expect from me" .... "ab heute wird zurÃ¼ck geschossen" (from today we shot back) and everyone was happy. remember the wrong infos.

fourth: fear. There was secret police and many other institutions. You canÂ´t trust someone. If you say "hitler is shit!" he /she betray and you get executed. A lot of people have to much fear to fight him. It was dangerous to find some allied

when you see his speachs you find some intresting samples

with sad voice he say... "on the border to xx was a assault on OUR PEOPLE!!"
his voice, the loudness perfect in timing

then connections like "they against us" , WE and I`M WITH YOU

I was four years in the german army. We get lessons how to find out who is a nazi. They exaggerate extrem...
for example: "if you see someone with 88 at his (dont know the word) car indication sign(?) you must be careful!!
because the "H" is the 8th letter in the alphabet. Then means 88 = HH = Heil Hitler (the nazi greeting)

Thats one of the reasons why i want know how the others think about germany.

shysnale · 03-18-2007, 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ego

Intelligent, inshightful and with tendency to make the wrong decision.
Truth is, if he had became analist, it would be better for everyone.

I believe the situation in the world at early '30 was something like "more dogs than bones". Jew were another dog for the bone.He thought he could do it.
Now, who else wants his bone? Aaha, marxistes.
(marxism is a 'divine' system, cannot be applicated my most humans.It presuppose accumulation and re-distribution)
Ok, they want to share, but not with him.
For him, they are the same. Different roads, same destination.
I believe the time he took the decision to attack, he was feeling surrounded.

whow very good answer.
thanks man

gal4 · 03-23-2007, 11:47 AM

I wish to thank the Russians for defeating the Germans at Stalingrad and Kursk.

Well, the irony of all this is that one dictatorship got repulsed by another.

Sometimes I wonder if democratic governments can fight dictatorships.

Well, we shall see.

tom8517 · 03-23-2007, 12:36 PM

That question has been raised a number of times, do democracies have the will to sacrifice large numbers of lives to defeat a dictator who does not have to concern himself with public opinion. Of course the answer is yes.

While its true that the Soviets did most of the heavy lifting in Europe, they could not have won without the British and Americans. There is an excellent chance that without Rommel and the Afrika Korp being distratced by the British in North Africa, that these extra armoured units may have given the Germans the extra push they needed to finish Russia in '41 and '42.

Also Italy and Japan were defeated with no help whatsoever from the USSR.

ego · 03-23-2007, 01:41 PM

None of the allies could won alone. Some of them (including Soviets) could defend their lands for ever, no matter how many extra panzers Hitler had.But to counterattack? No way.
I believe the important things that finally lead allies to victory, were:
The abillity of R.A.F. to defend England.
The will-power of English citizens while it was raining bombs.
The huge amount of recources and people that Soviets made Hitler spent.(ok, greece had a significant role played here, but i wont say so)
The abillity of Soviet industry to supply armies with heavy aggressive units.
The will of third countries (Canada, Australia,New Zeeland etc) to sacrifice their people in Europe.
The wrong choice Hitler made to organize himself the defence of Europe, when a landing was predictable. Rommel had suggest the fortification of north France.With him in charge, D-day would be much much more difficult.

Quote:

Originally Posted by gal4

Sometimes I wonder if democratic governments can fight dictatorships.

Always when defending.Never when attacking.

somedude · 03-23-2007, 02:14 PM

Following L's lead...

innocent · 03-23-2007, 02:18 PM

edited after second thoughts...

ego · 03-23-2007, 02:24 PM

I thought you were the leader

You experience a personality crisis?

03-17-2007, 11:02 AM	#41
Rogue Immoral Irishman Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 1,344 Reputation: 20982	Now we're talking... __________________ â€œBefore you criticize a woman, you should walk a mile in her shoes. That way, when you criticize her, you are a mile away and you have her shoes.â€

03-23-2007, 02:24 PM	#52
ego the obscure Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 3,457 Reputation: 14892	I thought you were the leader You experience a personality crisis? __________________ ..lure them all into the abyss!

03-17-2007, 08:31 PM	#45
Luke rape stalker or Jekyll and Hyde Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 781 Reputation: 1695	what i know about hitler is... he was a perfect speaker (for his intentions) the whole think was very well planed. First: "iÂ´m here for you" in germany was less jobs, he give jobs for all. Second: "the others are bad" with wrong informations like "they attack us" he get the folk on his side. third: "i do what you expect from me" .... "ab heute wird zurÃ¼ck geschossen" (from today we shot back) and everyone was happy. remember the wrong infos. fourth: fear. There was secret police and many other institutions. You canÂ´t trust someone. If you say "hitler is shit!" he /she betray and you get executed. A lot of people have to much fear to fight him. It was dangerous to find some allied when you see his speachs you find some intresting samples with sad voice he say... "on the border to xx was a assault on OUR PEOPLE!!" his voice, the loudness perfect in timing then connections like "they against us" , WE and I`M WITH YOU I was four years in the german army. We get lessons how to find out who is a nazi. They exaggerate extrem... for example: "if you see someone with 88 at his (dont know the word) car indication sign(?) you must be careful!! because the "H" is the 8th letter in the alphabet. Then means 88 = HH = Heil Hitler (the nazi greeting) Thats one of the reasons why i want know how the others think about germany.

03-23-2007, 11:47 AM	#47
gal4 UnWanted Trick Baby Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 834 Reputation: 584	I wish to thank the Russians for defeating the Germans at Stalingrad and Kursk. Well, the irony of all this is that one dictatorship got repulsed by another. Sometimes I wonder if democratic governments can fight dictatorships. Well, we shall see.

03-23-2007, 12:36 PM	#48
tom8517 Privileged Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 1,065 Reputation: 14858	That question has been raised a number of times, do democracies have the will to sacrifice large numbers of lives to defeat a dictator who does not have to concern himself with public opinion. Of course the answer is yes. While its true that the Soviets did most of the heavy lifting in Europe, they could not have won without the British and Americans. There is an excellent chance that without Rommel and the Afrika Korp being distratced by the British in North Africa, that these extra armoured units may have given the Germans the extra push they needed to finish Russia in '41 and '42. Also Italy and Japan were defeated with no help whatsoever from the USSR.

03-23-2007, 02:18 PM	#51
innocent Privileged Member Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: uk Posts: 2,110 Reputation: 9976	edited after second thoughts...