To the brave Crotch_Ripper (one to one only) - Page 3 - Rape Board

touriquet2001 · 12-19-2008, 06:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ctomie

The fact that you're commenting on a post here shows that you're getting involved. It's just like how you tried to declare that you would ignore me in our past battles but you still wound up posting to me.

Moderators can certainly make judgment calls on which threads they want to close without explicit permission from any members. My point is, assuming that they're not closing it but any posters in the thread want to, then only the thread starter has the right to ask. I know it because that's what one of the mods told me in the past (unless they've changed this policy).

I don't think this needs to continue as I've just noticed that theDarkOne has deleted all of his stupid posts. Some people should just learn to mind their own business...like the both of you.

like i said ...

Quote:

Originally Posted by touriquet2001

not to get involved in any of this other than to point out that this statement ...

not that i wasn't getting involved , but that i wasn't beyond that .

ctomie · 12-19-2008, 06:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by touriquet2001

like i said ...

not that i wasn't getting involved , but that i wasn't beyond that .

Quote:

Originally Posted by ctomie

The fact that you're commenting on a post here shows that you're getting involved.

So the statement above is correct...you just admitted it by stating "not that I wasn't getting involved".

touriquet2001 · 12-19-2008, 07:00 AM

lmao

nice word games ctomie . i remember that about you ....

ctomie · 12-19-2008, 07:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by touriquet2001

lmao

nice word games ctomie . i remember that about you ....

It's not word games but it's about being PRECISE, obviously a concept that you've yet to get into your head. I see that you still haven't taken a course on logic recently.

What is the matter with you now? You want to go at it with me again?

You're just as low as theShitOne. This is supposed to be a one-to-one thread and you're posting here.

Maybe you just can't resist replying to my posts like you did before. Good old memories...I know.

touriquet2001 · 12-19-2008, 07:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ctomie

It's not word games but it's about being PRECISE, obviously a concept that you've yet to get into your head. I see that you still haven't taken a course on logic recently.

What is the matter with you now? You want to go at it with me again?

You're just as low as theShitOne. This is supposed to be a one-to-one thread and you're posting here.

Maybe you just can't resist replying to my posts, like you did before.

*sigh*
i made a statement of fact in here . it was just a statement of fact .

then you posted implying that i said i wasn't getting involved , but that i actually was , so i corrected that . that has been the extent of my posts , other than laughing at one of your posts and explaining why . now that i've explained my posts in here for you maybe you can accept them for what they were .

ctomie · 12-19-2008, 07:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by touriquet2001

*sigh*
i made a statement of fact in here . it was just a statement of fact .

I can ask the mods for clarification about the thread locking issue. We don't need to discuss it here.

Quote:

Originally Posted by touriquet2001

then you posted implying that i said i wasn't getting involved , but that i actually was , so i corrected that . that has been the extent of my posts , other than laughing at one of your posts and explaining why . now that i've explained my posts in here for you maybe you can except them for what they were .

I don't think I was disagreeing with you on anything besides the thread locking statement. I replied to you just to let you know that you should interpret, make, and revise a statement in a more precise manner. Seriously, are you using a lame excuse to start shit with me again? (Oh I'm not assuming that you are starting it, or else I wouldn't have phrased it as a question. Again it's about being precise and you might as well learn it).

touriquet2001 · 12-19-2008, 07:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ctomie

I can ask the mods for clarification about the thread locking issue. We don't need to discuss it here.

I don't think I was even disagreeing with you on that one. I replied to you just to let you know that you should interpret, make, and revise a statement in a more precise manner. Seriously, are you using a lame excuse to start shit with me again? (Oh I'm not assuming that you are starting it, or else I wouldn't have phrased it as a question. Again it's about being precise and you might as well learn it).

no , i'm not starting anything .

if you want to lecture me on being "precise" maybe you should lecture yourself first though .

Quote:

Originally Posted by ctomie

The fact that you're commenting on a post here shows that you're getting involved. It's just like how you tried to declare that you would ignore me in our past battles but you still wound up posting to me.

this quote implies that i said something i didn't .

i'm off to have fun now

ctomie · 12-19-2008, 08:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by touriquet2001

no , i'm not starting anything .

Then quit posting in my thread.

Furthermore, if you have something to say to me then send me a PM, provided that it is not inflammatory.

Quote:

Originally Posted by touriquet2001

if you want to lecture me on being "precise" maybe you should lecture yourself first though .

Being someone who is well-acquainted with logical concepts (albeit rudimentary), I'm confident that I have what it takes to teach you how to be precise.

Let me test you: Do you still remember what "ad hominem" is and why is it a logical fallacy? If you can provide a satisfactory answer, maybe I will stop my lecturing.

Quote:

Originally Posted by touriquet2001

this quote implies that i said something i didn't .

i'm off now to have fun now

You said...

Quote:

not to get involved in any of this other than to point out that this statement ...

My reply was...

Quote:

The fact that you're commenting on a post here shows that you're getting involved.

I can't make this any simpler for you...You said something about a statement that belongs in this thread, so it means that you've gotten involved. I haven't said or implied anything beyond that.

This is just miscommunication...it's not like it hasn't happened before. There are bound to be ambiguities in languages and misunderstandings in communication. Just get over it and move on.

You thought I was disagreeing with you, and in light of this I have tried to clarify things for you, but you rejected my explanation and that is not my fault.

touriquet2001 · 12-19-2008, 08:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ctomie

You said...

My reply was...

I can't make this any simpler for you...You said something about a statement that belongs in this conversation, so it means that you've gotten involved. I haven't said or implied anything beyond that.

This is just miscommunication...it's not like it hasn't happened before. There are bound to be ambiguities in languages and misunderstandings in communication. Just get over it and move on.

You thought I was disagreeing with you, and in light of this I have tried to clarify things for you, but you rejected my explanation and that is not my fault.

lmfao
c'mon ctomie , let's look at your post i quoted ...

Quote:

Originally Posted by ctomie

The fact that you're commenting on a post here shows that you're getting involved.

maybe if that was all you posted you could make the claim you're making now and be believed . but coupled with the rest of your post speaks differently ...

Quote:

Originally Posted by ctomie

It's just like how you tried to declare that you would ignore me in our past battles but you still wound up posting to me.

this is what i meant by your word games

ctomie · 12-19-2008, 08:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by touriquet2001

lmfao
c'mon ctomie , let's look at your post i quoted ...

maybe if that was all you posted you could make the claim you're making now and be believed . but coupled with the rest of your post speaks differently ...

this is what i meant by your word games

Quote:

not to get involved in any of this other than to point out that this statement ...

It is true that you weren't getting involved in any part of this argument besides making the thread locking statement, but by making a post here you were effectively getting involved and that was my point all along.

I'll give it to you that my reply did not correspond to your quote (it is due to a misunderstanding, which I've already mentioned), but the content of it is true regardless.

Can't you just get over a simple misunderstanding? Heck that is not even the point of our discussion so why drag this on?

Quote:

not that i wasn't getting involved , but that i wasn't beyond that .

This is addressed by what I wrote above so I believe that I don't need to comment on this.

Just deal with this by sending me a damn PM. You shouldn't even be posting here in the first place (not that I'm saying that you're not allowed to, but it shows that you don't have the courtesy to respect a thread rule).

ctomie · 12-19-2008, 08:40 AM

touriquet...the two guys that I've initially fought with in this thread have already quitted. This thread has served its purpose and run its course so we should move this to PM. You very rarely do the right thing, so please try to do it this time.

touriquet2001 · 12-19-2008, 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ctomie

It is true that you weren't getting involved in any part of this argument besides making the thread locking statement, but by making a post here you were effectively getting involved and that was my point all along.

I'll give it to you that my reply did not correspond to your quote (it is due to a misunderstanding, which I've already mentioned), but the content of it is true regardless.

Can't you just get over a simple misunderstanding? Heck that is not even the point of our discussion so why drag this on?

This is addressed by what I wrote above so I believe that I don't need to comment on this.

Just deal with this by sending me a damn PM. You shouldn't even be posting here in the first place (not that I'm saying that you're not allowed to, but it shows that you don't have the courtesy to respect a thread rule).

okay i'm out of this now that you admitted it was your misunderstanding , instead of making it out to mine over and over again . since i already said that i was involved to that extent . i have no problems with anything else .

enjoy your day

touriquet2001 · 12-19-2008, 08:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ctomie

touriquet...the two guys that I've initially fought with in this thread have already quitted. This thread has served its purpose and run its course so we should move this to PM. You very rarely do the right thing, so please try to do it this time.

i'm sorry i've dealt with your PM's before , i don't care to it do again .

but i am out of here now that the misunderstanding is taken care of .

ctomie · 12-19-2008, 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by touriquet2001

okay i'm out of this now that you admitted it was your misunderstanding , instead of making it out to mine over and over again . since i already said that i was involved to that extent . i have no problems with anything else .

To be precise again...it is not my misunderstanding but a misunderstanding between us (and no I'm not playing word games here). You share equal responsibility in this because you need to ensure that your posts are intelligible.

Quote:

Originally Posted by touriquet2001

i'm sorry i've dealt with your PM's before , i don't care to it do again .

but i am out of here now that the misunderstanding is taken care of .

Ok you are dismissed.

Quote:

Originally Posted by touriquet2001

enjoy your day

Don't patronize me.

touriquet2001 · 12-19-2008, 08:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ctomie

To be precise again...it is not my misunderstanding but a misunderstanding between us (and no I'm not playing word games here). You share equal responsibility in this because you need to ensure that your posts are well-articulated.

didn't you just say (#76) you worded your post wrong or badly ? you know the one that made my second post necessary or did i misunderstand that ?

Quote:

Originally Posted by ctomie

Don't patronize me.

ok , have a bad day , since wishing you a good one is patronizing to you .

p.s. i'm trying to drop this if you'll let me

i already said i would

ctomie · 12-19-2008, 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by touriquet2001

didn't you just say (#76) you worded your post wrong or badly ? you know the one that made my second post necessary or did i misunderstand that ?

Nope. The content of the post by itself isn't wrong, it's just that it did not correspond to your quote and this is due to a misunderstanding between us in the discussion as a whole. I wasn't pointing to anything specific so there is no need to refer to any specific posts.

Basically, I couldn't completely understand what you wrote, because you didn't write things clearly.

Quote:

Originally Posted by touriquet2001

ok , have a bad day , since wishing you a good one is patronizing to you .

I know you hate my guts touriquet. Just think about how many times you've tried to fuck with me in the past. You've been against me since last year and all of a sudden you're playing "nice guy"? So yes this sounds very patronizing to me.

Quote:

Originally Posted by touriquet2001

p.s. i'm trying to drop this if you'll let me

i already said i would

If you stop then I'll stop (note the order). We've fought before, so you know better than most members.

Everytime someone attacks me I will keep on replying to them until they quit. Yes I know my actions are a bit extreme...but I'm getting so damn irritated of being on the receiving end of all the stupid attacks around here!

touriquet2001 · 12-19-2008, 09:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ctomie

Nope. The content of the post by itself isn't wrong, it's just that it did not correspond to your quote and this is due to a misunderstanding between us in the discussion as a whole. I wasn't pointing to anything specific so there is no need to refer to any specific posts.

Basically, I couldn't completely understand what you wrote, because you didn't write things clearly.

I know you hate my guts touriquet. Just think about how many times you've tried to fuck with me in the past. You've been against me since last year and all of a sudden you're playing "nice guy"? So yes this sounds very patronizing to me.

If you stop then I'll stop (note the order). We've fought before, so you know better than most members.

Everytime someone attacks me I will keep on replying to them until they quit. Yes I know my actions are a bit extreme...but I'm getting so damn irritated of being on the receiving end of all the stupid attacks around here!

roflmao

have it "your" way .

and yes i do know how you are . but then almost the whole board does too .

but i don't hate you , sorry .

btw way i've always been "nice" and listened to you . you were always the first the fling shit around because i dared to disagree with some of the things you posted . i'm was surprised you refrained from the name calling this time .

Fibonacci · 12-19-2008, 09:29 AM

He will never stop Touri, only he wants is to write another and another post. No matter how useless and boring to read they are. So from now, please, if anybody wants to say something to him, do it in one post and don't reply any more. Lets have him the last word - last word is anyway the worst idea for him

Hey ctomie, here is a box you can write your answer into ... hope it is long enough

Quote:

____________________________________________
____________________________________________
____________________________________________
____________________________________________
____________________________________________
____________________________________________
____________________________________________
____________________________________________

ctomie · 12-19-2008, 09:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by touriquet2001

roflmao

have it "your" way .

and yes i do know how you are . but then almost the whole board does too .

No you don't, and you're not in the position to judge my character.

Quote:

Originally Posted by touriquet2001

but i don't hate you , sorry .

btw way i've always been "nice" and listened to you . you were always the first the fling shit around because i dared to disagree with some of the things you posted . i'm was surprised you refrained from the name calling this time

Do you listen? Yes, you do that sometimes. But trying to be courteous? Don't think so.

You are (partially) right I've been hostile to you in the past, not because you disagreed with my posts, but because of the manner in which you disagreed with them, augmented by your refusal to apply logic in your posts.

touriquet2001 · 12-19-2008, 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ctomie

No you don't, and you're not in the position to judge my character.

Do you listen? Yes, you do that sometimes. But trying to be courteous? Don't think so.

You are (partially) right I've been hostile to you in the past, not because you disagreed with my posts, but because of the manner in which you disagreed with them, augmented by your refusal to apply logic in your posts.

just to show how you are ...

ummm , can i ask which is it ???

Quote:

Originally Posted by ctomie

We've fought before, so you know better than most members.

Quote:

Originally Posted by touriquet2001

and yes i do know how you are .

Quote:

Originally Posted by ctomie

No you don't,

i don't need an answer . that describes all of your disagreements perfectly .

now i think i'll take Fibonacci's advice

12-19-2008, 07:00 AM	#43
touriquet2001 please delete Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 3,805 Reputation: 35886	lmao nice word games ctomie . i remember that about you ....

12-19-2008, 08:40 AM	#51
ctomie Banned Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Asia Posts: 568 Reputation: 8860	touriquet...the two guys that I've initially fought with in this thread have already quitted. This thread has served its purpose and run its course so we should move this to PM. You very rarely do the right thing, so please try to do it this time.