Message board for people who wish to roleplay and discuss rape fantasies. |
|
Welcome to the Rape Board - Free rape pictures and videos. |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
Rape gallery | Incest gallery | Bestiality gallery | Gay sex gallery | Anime gallery | Scat gallery |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-05-2007, 12:37 PM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Location: www.asexuality.org
Posts: 203
Reputation: 77 |
Father Tucker
Are you pro- or against Father Tucker cartoons?
FIRST WATCH ALL THE EPISODES! P.S.: Don't ban me 'cause this is not pedo . It's lolicon and shotacon. |
10-05-2007, 01:20 PM | #2 | |
Privileged Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 944
Reputation: 404 |
Quote:
You keep convincing yourself that it's not pedo, and I'll keep convincing myself you're not an idiot. Fingers crossed for a perma-ban this time. You've earnt it! |
|
10-05-2007, 02:16 PM | #3 |
W.I.R. and Marshal
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Way out West!!!!
Posts: 8,566
Reputation: 124981 |
They're kinda tasteless but are pun cartoons...so you'll live Jack!
__________________
I'm a pervert and proud of it! |
10-05-2007, 02:32 PM | #4 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Location: www.asexuality.org
Posts: 203
Reputation: 77 |
Quote:
And by the way: the banning system that is provided in the Rules threads didn't work for me. According to the rules, first time when breaking the rules was supposed to give me just a warning, but I was banned. How do y' like that? |
|
10-05-2007, 03:37 PM | #5 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Away from here
Posts: 2,038
Reputation: 1051 |
Quote:
|
|
10-05-2007, 07:04 PM | #6 |
PUSSYCRUSHER
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: YOUR MOMMAS HOUSE
Posts: 2,161
Reputation: 9875 |
What Sort Of Question Is That - Are U Pro Or Not ??
Y The Fuck Would It Be Necessary To Ask Such A Question ?? How The Fuck Would The Answer Help You ?? Here Is An Answer For You - STOP POSTING PEDO SHIT ON THIS BOARD !! ITS NEVER FUCKING FUNNY !! IF U ARE INTERESTED IN PEDO SHIT - THEN FIND AN UNUSUALLY PAINFULL WAY TO END YOUR LIFE !!
__________________
The Original PUSSYCRUSHER !! |
10-06-2007, 05:54 PM | #7 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Location: www.asexuality.org
Posts: 203
Reputation: 77 |
Quote:
|
|
10-06-2007, 05:59 PM | #8 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Location: www.asexuality.org
Posts: 203
Reputation: 77 |
Quote:
|
|
10-07-2007, 11:29 AM | #9 | |
Immoral Irishman
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,344
Reputation: 20982 |
Quote:
__________________
“Before you criticize a woman, you should walk a mile in her shoes. That way, when you criticize her, you are a mile away and you have her shoes.†|
|
10-07-2007, 01:03 PM | #10 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
oh grow up and quit your fucking crying !!!!! the hell you're not making a big deal of it !!!! i'd like to know what you call a little deal . as for the rest i don't know anything about it . but if your posts are anything to go by ... MDS is 100% correct and you are full of shit !!!! |
|
10-12-2007, 12:58 AM | #11 | |
Opinionated Bitch
|
Quote:
As far as pedo or not, seems like it's more about poking fun at priests and certain .. eh.. habits some are reported to have. At least there have recently been some very well documented cases in the U.S. It sure didn't seem designed to sexually stimulate anybody, so I would not consider it pedo. But still, given the context and nature of this board, I can understand why it might not be the best place to post it and not get it called "pedo."
__________________
Half the harm that is done in this world Is due to people who want to feel important They don't mean to do h arm But the harm does not interest them. Or they do not see it, or they justify it Because they are absorbed in the endless struggle To think well of themselves. T. S. Eliot |
|
10-12-2007, 01:05 AM | #12 |
Opinionated Bitch
|
Never mind, I found out, this explains what it is.
http://theanimeblog.com/2006/12/02/p...-love-or-hate/ Seems it is pedo cartoons. There's an interesting poll there too. Maybe we should do our own?
__________________
Half the harm that is done in this world Is due to people who want to feel important They don't mean to do h arm But the harm does not interest them. Or they do not see it, or they justify it Because they are absorbed in the endless struggle To think well of themselves. T. S. Eliot |
10-12-2007, 02:11 AM | #13 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 13
Reputation: 1165 |
Quote:
|
|
10-13-2007, 06:35 AM | #14 |
Privileged Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Texass
Posts: 688
Reputation: 541 |
And loli/shota is currently illegal or in questionable status in the US as well. It's been shot down TWICE by the Supreme Court as cartoons do not harm children, but the idiot child of GWB Sr. decided to toss Yet Another Effing Statute at cartoons. That will also fail the Supreme Court litmus test, but it hasn't been brought before them yet...
Damn, but I'll be glad when the dick-brain gets ousted from office!
__________________
Character is what you are in the dark... John Whorfin
|
10-13-2007, 03:01 PM | #15 |
Opinionated Bitch
|
I doubt it will ever be illegal in the U.S. Banning cartoon depictions would be a first step towards banning literature with under-aged sex and realationships, resulting in a ban of "Lolita" and even "Romeo and Juliet."
The only pedo porn that should be illegal is that which exploits and abuses REAL children, and that is what US law currently labels as illegal child porn. Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition (this is the latest word on this issue from the U.S. Supreme Court) http://www.freedomforum.org/template...cumentID=16082 Excerpt: The Supreme Court has once again planted the First Amendment flag in cyberspace, ruling yesterday that Congress acted unconstitutionally when it banned so-called “virtual†child pornography, which only appears to depict minors. The law sweeps too broadly by outlawing expression in which no real children are used, the court said, and could, if taken literally, criminalize modern-day renditions of "Romeo and Juliet." Justice Anthony Kennedy, writing for a 6-3 majority, said the 1996 federal law “turns the First Amendment upside down†by outlawing protected speech as a way of banning unprotected child pornography. The law, said Kennedy, “prohibits speech that records no crime and creates no victims by its production.†Federal law has long forbidden child pornography that uses real children, but Congress in 1996 expanded the statute to include computer-generated images that “appear to be of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct.†“It was a Brennan-like statement of the importance of maintaining First Amendment protections,†said Michael Bamberger, a New York partner at Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal who co-wrote a brief in the case on behalf of book, magazine and video publishers. “They are reminding us that just because the goals of Congress were legitimate, that does not validate the law.†http://supct.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/00-795.ZS.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashcrof...eech_Coalition http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/script...0&invol=00-795
__________________
Half the harm that is done in this world Is due to people who want to feel important They don't mean to do h arm But the harm does not interest them. Or they do not see it, or they justify it Because they are absorbed in the endless struggle To think well of themselves. T. S. Eliot |
10-13-2007, 03:37 PM | #16 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Location: www.asexuality.org
Posts: 203
Reputation: 77 |
Thanks for sharing, Emily.
That site is obviously hosted in a country where loli/shota/pedo cartoons are legal. The legal issues of linking to that site depends on the location of the linker site's hosting company's servers. If rape board is hosted somewhere where it's illegal, please be so kind as to inform me and take the link down. If not, then all is ok. |
10-13-2007, 10:01 PM | #17 |
Privileged Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Texass
Posts: 688
Reputation: 541 |
I'm pretty sure all the earlier acts or laws were struck down by the Supreme Court for being either 'overly vague' or because cartoons 'do not show harm against persons'. That should have included the 1996 act. GWB Jr signed the PROTECT Act of 2003 that attempts to overturn the Supreme Court (again), and it hasn't been tested since then. I have to disappear for several days, but I'll look up the relevant statutes when I get back.
The ban on computer generated kiddy porn that's indistinguishable from real people will hold against the Supreme Court ruling, though. The court only said that CARTOONS were exempt. Anything that attempts to portray real pedophilia via 3D graphics SHOULD damn well be banned. Persuant to USC § 2257, all characters were CELLULOID at the time of production... only ink and paper were harmed.
__________________
Character is what you are in the dark... John Whorfin
|
|
|