Message board for people who wish to roleplay and discuss rape fantasies. |
|
Welcome to the Rape Board - Free rape pictures and videos. |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
Rape gallery | Incest gallery | Bestiality gallery | Gay sex gallery | Anime gallery | Scat gallery |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
05-18-2006, 07:23 AM | #21 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 6
Reputation: 10 |
RC was never about free speech. It was a created as a place to have fun. Raymond Pist did much to make the place much less fun and he was removed. He is no more 'entitled' to his free speech there than he is in any privately owned place. If he comes to my house and insists on coming in a spewing a bunch of garbage, he's getting tossed out on his ear. That doesn't mean his rights have been violated. Not being allowed to post on one internet board does not equal the Nazi's treatment of Jews.
But it obviously was never about Pist's ferverant desire to promote free speech. If it was, he would not then work to deny other's their ACTUAL right to free speech. His 'I hate the government' stance lasted only so long as it didn't get in the way. He is more than willing to run to them to get them to shut up speech he doesn't care for. Rape Board, from what I have seen, is more about free speech and good for it. There is certainly a place for that. Two different styles of board. |
05-18-2006, 08:20 AM | #22 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 3
Reputation: 10 |
Quote:
various of your members and members of RC (as well as admins) can offer evidence of Pist's actions, assertions and bare faced lies. You will not find him to be a positive presence. |
|
05-18-2006, 09:29 AM | #23 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Politics, Politics, Politics, shitye remarks, back stabbing, Who gives a flying F
Last edited by clan_hunter; 05-18-2006 at 09:41 AM. |
05-18-2006, 09:32 AM | #24 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
arent u the same guy who cried about losing ur girlfriend to another online guy? BWAHHAHahahahhahahahahahahah |
|
05-18-2006, 09:39 AM | #25 | |
Rape Board Chancellor
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Southern Ontario, Canada
Posts: 409
Reputation: 768 |
Quote:
"Hello, you've reached the suicide prevention hotline. This is PG speaking, how can I help you?..."
__________________
In Somnium, Veritas Last edited by Rheostatic; 05-18-2006 at 09:43 AM. |
|
05-18-2006, 01:10 PM | #26 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
ill take the job, if i get to hand out razorblades |
|
05-18-2006, 04:43 PM | #27 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 6
Reputation: 10 |
Quote:
|
|
05-18-2006, 04:50 PM | #28 | |
W.I.R. and Marshal
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Way out West!!!!
Posts: 8,566
Reputation: 124981 |
Quote:
|
|
05-18-2006, 04:53 PM | #29 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 6
Reputation: 10 |
Quote:
|
|
05-18-2006, 05:08 PM | #30 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: The Black Country
Posts: 956
Reputation: 1332 |
Quote:
Gay vicar Grm |
|
05-19-2006, 02:04 PM | #31 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
|
05-19-2006, 02:30 PM | #32 |
Senior Member
|
It is important to bear in mind the stakes we are debating for here. An honest libertarian values freedom not just for some arbitrary reason but because freedom is what human beings innately deserve and desire. Because to be free is to be able to grow and mature and become an ethical human being in the fullest sense of the word. And this means that an honest, authentic libertarian not only opposes negatively any unnecessary domination or authoritarian intervention that does not stop a rights conflict or perform some vital need, but also personally does not resolve disputes with any statist means until one has completely exhausted all possible alternatives, ESPECIALLY when this person clearly behaved cavalierly without the slightest regard for the safety or comfortability of the PRIVATE forum he was part of. Even Murray Rothbard, in his libertarian utopia, uses only a judicial system, not a parliamentary or legislative system, to resolve disputes, one where there is a fair arbiter but where people themselves adversarially decide. (I have some problems with Rothbard and his ideas, and support a non-statist anarchist federated polity and economy, but that is neither here nor there).
"Fair enough,though the irony of course is that this public debate must take place here, rather than at RC, where it began. Because I currently am unable to post on RC--what with being banned and all. This challenge would have gone unanswered except for the fact that some of my old friends from RC called it to my attention. " Ironic, yes. Good point? No. "Let's start with your last question first: What RC did, specifically, is ban me, not because I broke any laws or any rules, but because someone didn't like some of the things I said (while other people DID like the same things, and still others took the more appropriate position that I was entitled to my opinions, even if they dissagreed. And of course, everyone had the option to use the "ignore" button on me.) I was banned, permanently, without warning, and without good reason, from a forum where I made numerous on-topic contributions, and made more than a few friends. That's what they did." Well, Raymond, there's a few problems with that argument. First of all, an admin can stop even cogent and thoughtful posts if the posts are so detrimental to the character of the site that they actually ruin everyone else's time, just as if I show up to a book club about Bakunin and start talking about Harry Potter and the administrator decides to ask me to PARTICIPATE. This can be abused, but many of your posts could easily be justified as being eliminated under this rubric. Second, with rape fantasy, to clearly acknowledge the rights and responsibilities of the men and women involved and to distinguish between fantasy and reality, whatever our predilections, is also important. This is another thing that I think you may misunderstand or improperly check against. Third, if you are banned, perhaps e-mailing the admin and asking what happened would be a good idea before you attempt to ruin the whole site. And when you were given a second chance, you were rude and crass to administrators and others. A certain level of courtesy, behavior and wisdom is appropriate, and I feel that you may be lacking it. Now, I happen to disagree with your banning, but clearly to trump authoritarian motives by private, non-corporate actors who are acting, possibly misguided, in the best interest of the long-term existence and membership of the forum, with asking PUBLIC tyranny to intervene on your behalf is a joke. You are asking the state to oppress in order to stop oppression. That is antithetical to every part of libertarianism. I would personally have tolerated some of what you did and then PMed you privately with warnings or used the delete button. By the by, the fact that others can go out of their way to ignore you does not justify you being a troll. QED. "Does it warrent "outing the community to your friends and family"? No. Nor do I understand why you would think that I have the power to do that. I don't know any of your family or friends. Most people don't post under their real names. And my beef is not with any individual member of RC. Just with the administrator who wrongly banned me. And even for that, I hold no real animosity, I only asked that the situation be resolved." Sometimes, Raymond, in the real world bosses and other people will do mean and unwarranted things to you. The only recourse, sometimes, is to grow up. Not beg for Big Brother to help. By the way, Raymond: If the FBI or other agencies or groups do end up actually paying any attention, I doubt it but hey, they can do IP scans and investigation and find pretty much everything about every one of us out. Especially those with pictures posted. Further, the more someone posts, the more likely they will be able to find things out about them. Therefore, you are punishing people for cogent activity. The ironies just mount. "RC and online communities like it exist only because they fly under the radar of those busybodies who would like to see it censored. Just bringing it to the attention of these holier-than-thou pencil-pushers would likely be the beginning of the end of RC. (And while they look for ways to pull the plug, RC would be under such intense scrutiny, that NOBODY would feel free to speak their minds.)" Which is precisely why your behavior is so noxious and against proper expression, far trumping your own illegitimate experience. Bear in mind, Raymond, that though alternative media for you do not justify bad administration, you can, at NO COST and very little time, create your own forum or site, possibly even getting it linked from Rape Club or Rape Board. You can use personals. You can join dozens of other boards. A forum, which is a PRIVATE institution, has a certain degree of leeway to make standards of behavior and content and to ban those who do not comply. "THIS is what was done to me. Is my nose for irony really that keen, that I'm the only one who can see it? I'm going to type this next bit really slowly: THEY prevented ME from posting, sooooooooooooo my only recourse was to say "Excuse me, but if you don't allow me to post, I'll do that which is in my power to show you how it feels to not be allowed to post." It's the only option I had. While I believe in free speech on the internet, forgive me if I don't shed a tear at the prospect of those who do NOT believe in free speech being censored. Those who CLAIM to believe in free speech, but mean free speech only for themselves and not others, are much less deserving of that right." No, you had another option, Raymond. Be the bigger man and put it down. Make a new account and behave according to the rules of the forum. NO ONE EVER DESERVES TO BE DEPRIVED OF THE RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH. By your logic, Republicans and Nazis could be deprived of their rights to free speech and justice. If libertarianism is to mean ANYTHING, and Chomsky and Rand agree on this, Pist, it is CATEGORICAL. NO ONE is deprived of the rights that are provided. As Chomsky puts it, Stalin and Hitler were for free speech they liked. "Finally, we're up to your first sentence. Objectivists and Liberertarians rarely see eye to eye (Objectivists claim that Libertarans "stole" the idea of freedom from them. ) And of course, neither Objectivists nor Libertarians suffer Fascists gladly. And Fascists hate everybody." You're joking, right? Ayn Rand describes a system of market justice and personal rights that, whether or not an individual libertarian left or right disagrees with it (I sure as hell do), is fully in line with libertarianism. Other Objectivist philosophies are very much anti-libertarian... as anti-libertarian as turning to the FBI to repress others' speech because you don't like what they say on their own board that they put their own effort and time to run. "I haven't threatened to shut RC down. Again, I don't know why you would endow me with such superpowers. I only threatened to bring RC to the attention of those type of people who like to shut these types of things down. And only that, IF I wasn't allowed to post there, just like everyone else who abides by the rules." "I didn't shoot him, officer, I just hired someone else to do it!" Actually, Raymond, I would respect you MORE if you handled the problem yourself. The fact that you turn to state repression and then try to wash your hands of it is the PROBLEM. Don't ever claim you're a libertarian if you call the cops because your feelings are hurt. "NOBODY who posts there wants RC to be shut down. Again, I've been in contact with some very sensible people who agree that having a pissing match is silly when we really all just want the same thing: to be able to discuss our opinions in a vibrant online community on topics which interest us all. There are some technical issues yet to be hammered out, and there is some concern about how some of the folks who were responsible for getting me unfairly banned in the first place will respond to my return." Fantastic. Then put down the big repressive stick and handle it privately. Make compromises. Listen. Actually put your money where your mouth is. Liberty is hard. Justice is hard. It requires respecting other people's latitude. "So you see, there is no need at the moment to be overly concerned with me carrying out my threat anyway. I'm confident that in the end, freedom will prevail---it usually does in the long run. " Hitler could have said that. Neither you or I would respect that answer with a response. The fallacy is obvious: Your individual contribution against freedom, no matter how small or unsuccessful, is wrong. You then DARE to quote Niemoller, ignoring that YOU are the one trying to get the Jews shot. By the way, Raymond... I proposed the title, Objectivist Neo-Fascist, to Pieter. Here's why. You advocate free speech while turning to repression to deprive it. Ironically echoing the very hypocrisy you say should deprive you of free speech. YOU YOURSELF HAVE PRODUCED THE JUSTIFICATION FOR YOUR BAN. Your interlocutors hold less extreme free speech positions than you do, there is no hypocrisy except that you express. (I, incidentally, hold much more extreme, and consistent, ones.)
__________________
"The BDSM credo, "safe, sane and consensual," does NOT mean that all scenes have to be about consent fantasies. It means only that all participants should consent to what their scene consists of. And if I want my boyfriend to chase me around the house, fling me on the bed, pull off my clothes and pry my legs open.." - Lorelei Last edited by Brek; 05-19-2006 at 02:36 PM. |
05-19-2006, 02:54 PM | #33 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
|
05-19-2006, 04:12 PM | #34 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
`
Last edited by cleanfun4all; 05-20-2006 at 12:09 PM. |
05-19-2006, 11:19 PM | #35 |
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 3
Reputation: 10 |
Ah yes, please forgive my young friend Brek. He has yet to learn the art of brevity. He is a zealous young man of good heart for which I cannot say enough good things.
A bit of explanation also for he who identifies himself as SomeDude: I listed Persiangurl as my referral because I wished to be noticed by such a beautiful young woman. Those such as me, well into advanced age, require such rays of sunshine in our lives. No harm was meant and I hope none was taken. But enough of this and back to the discussion at hand. To make dear Brek’s points clear: Raymond Pist: you are an enemy of free speech. You would set in motion the mechanism of the state that could have repercussions far beyond one little bulletin board. The Internet is still a fragile place and governments everywhere are still struggling to deal with its implications. China has responded to the threat of open discourse among its population by building firewall to block access to what it deems dangerous. Other states may follow. So you bring the attention of the religious right and politicians to bear in order to shut down RC. Do you think it would stop there? This forum would also become a target. But this site and many others exist outside the territorial boundaries of the United States. How long before that which you would set in motion would build a barrier, like that China has built, to prevent access to sites like this? How long before more and more topics are included? I should hope that you would reconsider your plans based on what I have said. Do not be an enemy of free speech. |
05-19-2006, 11:32 PM | #36 |
W.I.R. and Marshal
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Way out West!!!!
Posts: 8,566
Reputation: 124981 |
My thought on this whole thread is, khorus e piræm chetoreh?
|
05-20-2006, 12:24 AM | #37 | |
Opinionated Bitch
|
Quote:
|
|
05-20-2006, 01:28 AM | #38 | |
UnWanted Trick Baby
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 834
Reputation: 584 |
Brek's reply translated into Pig Latin.
Quote:
|
|
05-20-2006, 01:50 AM | #39 |
W.I.R. and Marshal
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Way out West!!!!
Posts: 8,566
Reputation: 124981 |
LMAO gal4!!!
|
05-20-2006, 03:58 AM | #40 | |
Opinionated Bitch
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|