Qandeel Baloch is dead.
 

I can't post out side links, so go search her name, and then come back and tell me that the likes of ISIS and Al Qaida, and their execution methods do not represent mainstream Islam.

She was murdered by her own brother, not some extremist group.

The execution/murder of female Muslim victims is commonplace and worn to the core by those pathetic assholes. The reasons are more bizarre than western values can comprehend. I compare the reasons to the Japanese kamikaze attacks in WW2. Americans could never get a handle on that mindset. Hell, the most perverse portion of all of the Muslim ideology somehow came up with female circumcision. How entirely fucked up is that?

No nation or civilization can co-exist with the Muslim ideology.

Like communism, the Muslim ideology is not a religion, it is a political design for world domination!

The non-Muslim world needs to wake up and address the reality of the situation!

:skull-bee

Qandeel Balochs brother has been arrested, and has reportedly expressed he has no regrets about killing her. He told police that he killed her because she was bringing dishonour to his family. He claims he gave her a tablet to subdue her first, and that she was not aware she was being killed. How compassionate of him!

This is according to a report on Sky News website.

Whilst I agree with much of what you write, as far as I'm aware, female circumcision is neither an invention of, or exclusive to, Islamic tradition.

Regarding the Kamakaze attacks of WWII, that is probably a measure of the loyalty and effectiveness of training in the Japanese armed forces. Compare it with the "going over the top" attacks of WWI, or even the suicide bombings that whilst brought to the Western public attention by Islamic fighters, were very much the invention of the Tamil Tigers in Sri Lanka.

You might also consider the H-Block hunger strikers of the Provisional IRA in the 1980s. These men were no longer on active service, yet insisted on being treated as prisoners of war rather than criminals, risking death for their cause.

Then there is your own nations rebellion. If it had failed, then the men that led it would almost certainly have been tortured and then executed for treason. You only have to look back at my nations history for evidence of that. Yet those men still chose to risk all.

What would you be willing to risk in the defence of the Republic of Texas, today?

Even though there are others that do commit female circumcision, it is my understanding that it is an Islamic law.

In WWII, our military couldn't get their minds around the kamikaze raids.

Dying for an Emperor was too foreign to understand. Dying and killing for Allah seems to fit in that same category.

In defense of my family, I would sacrifice my life or my liberty. Under no circumstance would I commit a suicidal act of terrorism. In defense of my state, I would never knowingly serve on a suicide mission. My philosophy is and always has been not to die for my cause but to make sure the other guy dies for his cause.

:skull-bee

Neither female circumcision nor honor killings are part of Islamic Law. They are detestable practices within some cultures that are Muslim. Don't get me wrong though, I am no fan of Sharia or any other form of religious law!

"Hadith

The fitrah is five things, including circumcision

Note that the rule of hadith dictate that if it is not mentioned specifically or if the pronouns do not point to a certain gender, then the hadith is valid for both sexes. Hence, the following hadiths are applicable for both men and women.

Abu Hurayrah said: I heard the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) say: “The fitrah is five things – or five things are part of the fitrah – circumcision, shaving the pubes, trimming the moustache, cutting the nails and plucking the armpit hairs.”

Bukhari 5891; Muslim 527


A preservation of honor for women

Abu al- Malih ibn `Usama's father relates that the Prophet said: "Circumcision is a law for men and a preservation of honour for women."

Ahmad Ibn Hanbal 5:75; Abu Dawud, Adab 167.


Do not cut "severely"

Note that the judgement concerning what is severe is relative.

Narrated Umm Atiyyah al-Ansariyyah: A woman used to perform circumcision in Medina. The Prophet (peace be upon him) said to her: Do not cut severely as that is better for a woman and more desirable for a husband."...

https://wikiislam.net/wiki/Qur'an,_H...tal_Mutilation

Found this on the Internet, so it must be true.

"Hundreds, if not thousands, of women are murdered by their families each year in the name of family "honor." It's difficult to get precise numbers on the phenomenon of honor killing; the murders frequently go unreported, the perpetrators unpunished, and the concept of family honor justifies the act in the eyes of some societies."

"In countries where Islam is practiced, they're called honor killings"

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...orkilling.html

Again, an Internet find, so it must be factual.

The Sky News report I read on Balochs murder claimed 500 honour killings a year in Pakistan alone. They certainly also happen in the United Kingdom.

It is worth noting at this point that Sharia Law is based upon the Hadith, that is the recorded words and deeds of Mohammed, not just on the commandments given in the Koran. So it wouldn't surprise me if some where in the Hadith is a record of Mohammed either executing a female, or ordering her execution for some crime of defaming her family, or for adultery.

Me neither, although I might turn a blind eye to their practise of chopping hands off thieving bastards. :skull-bee

First, any who may remember me Hello, It's been a very long time. An interesting thread, in particular in how others have sacrificed their lives contrasted with the suicide bombers of modern Islamic terrorism.

To begin, with the last post, oh hell no, people do not get their hands cut off for theft. People steal for a whole host of reasons, some noble, feed the family I allow this the rare exception. Some for a thrill, some are professional criminals. My father caught me stuffing hard candy from a supermarket bin in my pocket when I was 4. He took me back to the store, made me tell the store manager what I did, then he made me ask the store manager to please not call the police.

I never stole anything again, but I am very glad I still have my hands.

The Japanese soldiers who flew their planes into American ships, were not terrorists. They made the choice to make the ultimate sacrifice for their country, they knew they were losing the war. But, and I say this as a USMC veteran who has no love for suicide attacks on our fleet. But keep in mind they were directed against military targets, and with a military objective.

The reference to the IRA in an earlier post is perhaps even more telling, the IRA is perhaps unique in modern guerilla/terrorist organizations in that they in made a practice of phoning in warnings prior to the bomb going off. I am not trying here to be an apologist for the IRA, they did inflict civilian casualties, and they were involved in some horrific atrocities. But the statistics I have seen show upward of 75% of the casualties inflicted by the IRA were on armed members of the security forces.

so, back to the point of the thread, the terrorists of ISIS and Al Qaeda have no historical justification. When a groups aims are nationalism, or ideology, a negoation is possible, but when your enemy thinks he has a direct line to
God, you pretty much have to kill him

Muslim terrorism is nothing new. The very word “assassin” originates from the medieval Nizari Ismailis.

Terrorism was and is used to intimidate the rulers and the ruled into behavior approved of by the Islamic terrorists. Even the great Saladin changed his policies when he awoke with an assassin’s dagger next to him.

The Japanese used the Kamikaze as a weapon of terror. They knew the war was lost and an unconditional surrender was inevitable. The Kamikaze attacks were a last ditch effort to make the war too costly for the United States. They were hoping that we would sue for peace and accept a conditional surrender.

Finally, the Japanese would have been more than happy to attack civilian targets. Fortunately, there weren’t any within their range. However, they did manage to get some 6,000 bombs carried by balloons into the jet stream that were designed to blow up randomly in the US. The FBI shut down all reports of the damage, so we'll never know their degree of success or failure.

We seem to learn nothing from history. We continue to wrestle with all of the underling assassins and do not go after the “Old Man on the Mountain”. The grandson of Genghis Khan figured it out and effectively put an end to the terror for a couple of centuries.

Cut the head off and the snake will die and there is a snake in at least 50% of all mosques. One small mosque in Florida has already turned out two suicide murderers. One died in Orlando and one died in Syria.

:skull-bee

Qandeel Baloch was apparently supporting her brothers (the one who strangled her and the one who helped him) financially. What a pair of shitbags, didn't like what she did for a living but happy to take handputs from the proceeds. Fucking scummy bastards.

circumcision origins have nothing to do with religion, it is just a higiene mesure. Extreme heat can cause sexual diseases 'hiv' and urinal infection to grow under the prepuce, that's why cutting it might be interesting. same thing with the pig stuff. pigs as well as any fat animals under extreme temperatures can carry many bad shit and you better not eat it. those 2 measures were just accepted by the society and became customs. When Islam began, all surrounding customs were absorded in this heavily loaded of despair and pain teaching that is Islam. This pretty much sums it all. Living under 45 degrees all year, in the fucking desert, with a very low economy, makes people in the desperate urge to believe in something. When they find that something, when their lives finally have a sense, they'd rather die instead of loosing it. They'd rather kill anyone likely to make them loose this new hope.

this folks arent' so bad after all.

the only people who really deserve to die are the French

and Trump Riper

Neither HIV or the urge to believe in something are temperature sensitive. But, you did make some interesting points.

As far as the French or Trump rippers, if I were you, I wouldn't drive a very large truck in France or travel to Philadelphia for a few days.

:skull-bee

"How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy.

The effects are apparent in many countries, improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement, the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Individual Muslims may
show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it.

No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome."

Sir Winston Churchill; (Source: The River War, first edition, Vol II, pages 248-250 London).

Churchill saw it coming.

:skull-bee

Sorry bro but you're a bit off the mark.

Haddit :

'If you ever meet someone disrespecting the prophet, do not hesitate to take his life, and do not fear Allah's judgement, he knows sedition is worse than murder'

Yes they are. You can carry hiv on your glans but not having it on your system. you fuck a hiv girl, she's got it on her mucous membranes and bingo !

while heat sometimes kill germs, it preserves bacteriological degeneration that triggers eating disorders (pigs issue), and it preserves a particular kind of squirt on the genitals (hiv issue)

sorry